Investigative Attorney Unit to Join L.A.’s Office of Child Protection

Today, Los Angeles County’s Board of Supervisors will vote on a motion that would bring a rarely heard from, but critically important, group of investigative attorneys under the Office of Child Protection’s control.

In 2008 the supervisors created the Children’s Special Investigative Unit and staffed it with attorneys who investigate cases of severe abuse and child death. The goal was to provide the county with recommendations on averting the kinds of preventable child tragedies that make headline news on “an attorney-client basis.”

Hitherto, the unit has produced 21 confidential reports.

The only one of the unit’s reports that ever became public was submitted to the county in 2012, but not released until leaked to The Los Angeles Times the following year. That report outlined “systemic issues” with the county’s child protection apparatus, most notably how poor child abuse investigations factored into the deaths or near fatalities of 15 children.

The 2012 "systemic issues" report was cited in the motion creating the county's Blue Ribbon Commission on Child Protection.
The 2012 “systemic issues” report was cited in the motion creating the county’s Blue Ribbon Commission on Child Protection.

The systemic issues report, and the 2013 death of 8-year-old Gabriel Fernandez, spurred the supervisors to impanel a blue ribbon commission to improve the county’s child protection apparatus.

The commission’s most notable recommendation was to create the Office of Child Protection, tasked with orienting all the county’s child-serving agencies towards improving child safety and well-being.

Thus, the idea of combining the Children’s Special Investigative Unit with the Office of Child Protection (OCP) is as natural as re-unifying a mother with her child.

“This Board motion is an important opportunity to eliminate overlap while improving oversight by the Office of Child Protection,” said one of the motion’s co-authors, Supervisor Mike Antonovich, in an email to The Chronicle.

For the past few months, the unit’s two staff attorneys have been working for the OCP, according to the office’s director, Michael Nash. Currently, they are helping to produce a report adjudging how the county gauges child abuse risk after the county’s most recent high-profile child death.

Moving forward it remains unclear whether or not the Children’s Special Investigative Unit will retain the “attorney-client” privilege it has enjoyed with county government since its inception.

The office of Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas, the motion’s other co-author, indicated that the issue of transparency would be considered if the motion passes.

“It is important to strike a balance between protecting a family’s privacy during such a painful and devastating loss and providing sufficient information to the public that could serve as a deterrent to future incidents of abuse and neglect,” said Ridley-Thomas in a statement sent to The Chronicle. “I trust that the OCP will take transparency and privacy-related issues into account when preparing recommendations for the Board’s review in April.”

The motion will give the OCP 90 days to report on whether or not the special investigations unit should be maintained in the 2017 budget.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Daniel Heimpel
About Daniel Heimpel 191 Articles
Daniel is the founder of Fostering Media Connections and the publisher of The Chronicle of Social Change.

2 Comments

  1. Sounds like a liability team to me….hiring two LIE-ers!! Looks like the office of child protection is more interested in it’s own welfare than that of children. Now we have special victims units reporting to lawyers, so glad Hitlery lost.

  2. This new unit will hardly do any good. The reality is The Board is already drowning under a sea of reports every day. Yet nothing fundamentally changes in any of the ‘county’ bureaucracies.

    The real failures here are The Board members themselves. Career politicians who lack the resolve and ability to effectively manage anything. There is no litmus test to sit on The Board of Supervisors. It’s all a popularity contest.

Comments are closed.