From Lock Up to Leaders: Formerly Incarcerated Youth Help Direct Juvenile Justice Policy in California

When Juan Gomez first arrived at a notorious California youth prison in rural Amador County at the age of 16, he remembers an acute sense of powerlessness.

Guards at the Preston Youth Correctional Facility patrolled the grounds with impunity, meting out beatings and macings to the youth locked up there.

Gomez, now 34, remembers cold, hungry nights in the dungeon-like Tamarack Hall, the high-security wing at Preston where many detainees spent 23 hours a day in solitary confinement or kept in metal cages. Grievances filed by youth at Preston went mostly unanswered.

The Preston Youth Correctional Facility in Ione, Calif., closed in 2011. Photo: http://bit.ly/2kUatPb

The distance between Gomez and his captors felt vast. Guards monitored their young charges from atop a tower, hidden by a shield of dark Plexiglass.

“You couldn’t really see inside,” Gomez said. “You had no idea what would happen because they had all the power.”

Although Preston was shuttered in 2011, California’s juvenile justice system is still in need of reform. Gomez is planning on making his voice heard.

Starting this year, he’ll be working at one of the highest levels of California state government, with a seat on the State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (SACJJDP).

But Gomez won’t be alone. He’ll be coming aboard along with three other young men with personal experiences of incarceration in the state’s juvenile justice system. Appointed by Gov. Jerry Brown, Kent Mendoza, Miguel Garcia and Ramon Leija will join Gomez on the SACJJDP. James Anderson, who was also incarcerated as a youth, has served on the committee since last year.

Part of the state’s Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC), the SACJJDP helps develop the state’s juvenile justice plan, providing input to the governor and the legislature while making sure juvenile justice programs across counties are compliant with federal and state law.

The BSCC meets today for the first time this year in San Diego, and the addition of a crop of formerly incarcerated youth to a BSCC committee that helps direct juvenile policy is a bracing moment for justice advocates in the state.

The little-known BSCC monitors the way billions of dollars are spent on incarceration in California, along with measuring outcomes, data collection and oversight of conditions at state correctional facilities, including juvenile camps, halls and ranches.

The BSCC and many of its committees – like the SACJJDP – are heavily stocked with members of the state’s law enforcement agencies. But it is far less common for the state to hear the perspective of youth in the justice system and those who have previously experienced incarceration at the Sacramento-based agency, according to juvenile justice advocates.

Frankie Guzman, a juvenile justice attorney with the National Center for Youth Law with his own story of surviving a stint in a state prison as a youth, said criminal justice systems have been slow to incorporate the voices of formerly incarcerated youth.

“For a long time, their voice was ignored and they have a side of story that has rarely been heard,” Guzman said.

Guzman said that the selection of five youth to the SACJJDP shows that California is leading the way toward providing a model of decision-making that values the perspective of young people who have a deep knowledge of the system and how it works. But the inclusion of voices like Gomez, Mendoza, Garcia and Leija on the state body also sends a powerful message to youth in the more than 100 juvenile detention facilities across the state.

Gomez, second from left, talks to youth as part of his work with MILPA in Salinas, Calif.

“It signals to all the youth who are exiting the justice system that you do have some value, you’re not a leper, you’re not a person who we want to marginalize and want to keep at the fringes,” Guzman said.

That lesson is not lost on Gomez.

Since exiting the California Youth Authority-run (now known as the Division of Juvenile Justice) facility at age 22, Gomez has channeled his experiences there into forming Motivating Individual Leadership for Public Advancement (MILPA). The Salinas organization works with troubled youth and young adults who have recently exited incarceration, using cultural healing practices to create systems change.

By participating in the SACJJDP, Gomez hopes to show that people who have experienced incarceration can offer fresh insight and solutions to the issues facing youth in the juvenile justice system.

“We’re probably going to be able to say or bring to light things that would not be said, things that wouldn’t even be imagined, let alone conceptualized, by others there,” Gomez said.

“Now we’re not just on the menu, but we’re also at the table.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Jeremy Loudenback
About Jeremy Loudenback 277 Articles
Jeremy is the child trauma editor for The Chronicle of Social Change.

1 Comment

  1. I am so happy to hear this. I agree that people with experience in the justice system need a much bigger seat at the table. The more I read people’s stories and learn about what people have faced, the more shocked and upset I feel by what people have had to endure.

    Emphasizing that every person has value is one I feel is so important. No matter what someone has done or what their position in life is, everyone has value as a human being. When people are treated like dirt, it is predictable that many people will end up doing worse rather than growing in positive ways. What amazes me is how often people who have been treated like dirt are able to find resilience and hope in truly horrific circumstances and find ways to help others. It happens more often than I would expect and it is inspiration. But we all need to work for a world in which no one is treated like dirt. At the most basic level, a lot of this is just not that complicated.

    There are a variety of complicated discussions that undoubtedly need to happen on any number of issues. Figuring out what approaches work best for different people can be complicated. If someone needs addiction treatment, for example, determining what approaches will likely work best may require the involvement of experts who are familiar with the topic. If someone struggles with anger issues, learning about what programs are evidence-based and help people work through those issues should involve evaluation of the relevant research and discussion with people who have experience in the area. The list could go on endlessly…

    But at the most basic level, this is just not as hard as we sometimes make out. A good starting point is: Don’t treat other people like dirt. Nobody likes that. Most people have at some point in their life been treated like dirt, some far more so than others, and few found the experience a good motivator for growth.

    So no matter what our experience and expertise in life, when we see other people being treated like dirt, it is important to remember that addressing that issue is not a task for an expert. It is something that anyone should be able to identify. It is important that as human beings when we see other people treated like dirt, we demand that those actions be stopped. It could just as easily be us some day in a different situation and so we should be able to empathize.

    It makes me very glad to see that people are serving in leadership roles to support and empower others.

Comments are closed.